Sorry @void I forgot today was Father's day and after I got picrel results there were like 10 ways to interpret the results. I settled on a relativity to JXL interpretation and I'm happy with it since it shows diminishing returns better.
Tearing off a whole MB chunk off an image with 0 loss in quality is pretty nice but shaving off a meager 10-20 KB, not so much tbh.

btw, ## Happy Father's Day

4chan thread is up, https://boards.4chan.org/g/thread/109108299

Put on your best war face @void maybe this is the day we get another friendo that cares about image compression here. If not then it was worth a shot I think.

Picrel oxiPNG_: 3166 KB
Lossless Webp: 2305 KB
~27% smaller

But whats the best webp compression settings for interracial porn?

>>785
Very nice charts, man. You really know your stuff

>>789
Were you the anon spamming interracial porn earlier today? lmao

HAPPY FATHER'S DAY

>>791
of coures, do you have any problem with interracial porn?

>>794
My lawyer won't let me answer that question

>>795
bullshit answer,
either you are prude or not, if you want to censor and be anti-free-speech, say it outright rather than wasting everyones time

>>796
Free speech isn't real in 2026

>>797
just because you are living in a censored dystopia (i think finland,right?), doesn't mean that we need such dystopias everywhere

oxiPNG_: 62 KB
picrel Lossless Webp: 35 KB
~44% smaller

>>790
Thanks man. I've been going at it since yesterday but I'm glad it turned out good. Practically speaking maybe this is what people will care about the most. Hell maybe lossless images will be the future if internet speeds keep improving all the time.

>>798
Unfortunately we can't all be protected by the first amendment. Anyway I don't allow NSFW in this website because people just use it to shit up boards like /r9k/ and /pol/ with IR and trans baiting crap
NSFW should be restricted to boards that are specific to that so it stays in topic

hey, i am looking into compressing this pic effectively, what AVIF settings should i use?

>>799
I think mobile is the real problem. On desktop a lot of people have fiber these days, but on mobile the connection is often too shitty

>>800
>NSFW should be restricted to boards that are specific to that so it stays in topic
I miss 4channel tbh, like it was one of the rare times Hiro tried to make the site better. Now you get goonbait ads all the time. I would have rather they kept the site ad free and just done charity begging events or something if nobody wanted to buy the stupid passes tbh.

>>801
AVIF is weird man, sometimes it will give you okay compression and sometimes it loses to fucking PNG. My OP has the parameters I found that apply max AVIF compression.

@void I'm curious man, if this is one of those cucker/soyjack terrorist spammers that use residential proxies, is it possible to defend against that without introducing the IQ test captchas?

btw I'm not even phased by this spam anymore, weird to even admit that. It's disgusting but sperging autists will sperg hard and 4chan's IQ captchas sometimes aren't enough it seems.

>>802
True and data caps on mobile are still a thing in 2026.

>>808
>if this is one of those cucker/soyjack terrorist spammers that use residential proxies, is it possible to defend against that without introducing the IQ test captchas?
Yeah, there are some methods, but it all boils down to cost-effectiveness
>btw I'm not even phased by this spam anymore, weird to even admit that. It's disgusting but sperging autists will sperg hard and 4chan's IQ captchas sometimes aren't enough it seems.
It's background noise mostly

oxiPNG_: 3142 KB
Picrel Lossless Webp: 2338 KB
~26% smaller

>>811
What is this game?

>>812
RE4 I think, it was on a /g/ thread about optimized PC games.

oxiPNG_: 307 KB
Picrel Lossless Webp: 195 KB
~37% smaller

oxiPNG_: 492 KB
Picrel Lossless Webp: 372 KB
~24% smaller

>>821
Cute pic, high quality

oxiPNG_: 58 KB
Picrel Lossless Webp: 34 KB
~41% smaller

>>822
Thanks, it's from an /a/ archive search. Some stuff can be pretty wholesome there sometimes.

oxiPNG_: 469 KB
Picrel Lossless Webp: 312 KB
~33% smaller

oxiPNG_: 180 KB
Picrel Lossless Webp: 119 KB
~34% smaller

oxiPNG_: 2872 KB
Picrel Lossless Webp: 2201 KB
~23% smaller

oxiPNG_: 1309 KB
Picrel Lossless Webp: 1033 KB
~21% smaller

oxiPNG_: 942 KB
Picrel Lossless Webp: 928 KB
~2% smaller

Most unusual result.

oxiPNG_: 133 KB
Picrel Lossless Webp: 82 KB
~38% smaller